The Article page is under construction
Note: HRCBM or HR Tribune does not
assume any responsibility of opinion express in the articles. The article
depicted here expresses the opinion of its writer. Anybody can submit an article
for consideration if the article addresses Human Rights Abuses against
minorities in Bangladesh either entirely or partially.
Genocide and Crime Against Humanity in Bangladesh
Part 1
By
Abinash Baghchi
Peace and harmony in the whole world
are being kept hostage due to two relatively insignificant problems (popular
comparison melon with peanut) in the present time, in terms of number of peoples
involved and murdered. However, in the backdoor of these two minor problems,
huge humanitarian catastrophes are being silently watched all over the world.
Some of these issues are taken up in terms of past, present and future
implications to the whole humanity, in this essay. This piece is mainly
concentrated on Indian-subcontinent in general, and Bangladesh in particular,
because of the serious conspiracy on the non-Muslim community in that country
(see recent postings
http://www.bangladesh-web.com/news). International perspective is also
touched whenever deemed necessary. The essay is divided into several
sub-sections although related to each other for the convenience of the readers
to pick up the topic of their liking since the piece a bit long. The author has
no intention to hurt the feelings of any individual, ethnic or religious groups
but issues are discussed as it is seen by an individual. Similarly, advance
apology from the author to the English speaking peoples because of the poor
linguistic quality.
-
Numbers game in
Bangladesh
-
So shameful
-
Be careful folks in the West
-
Connection of ethnical cleansing in Bangladesh and in
Kashmir
-
Mindset of
Bangladeshi Muslims
-
Butchers are still around
-
Moral and intellectual
crisis of the Muslims
-
How they do it in Bangladesh
The readers are referred to the
following two websites which are relevant, the first site is maintained by the
USA
(http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook)
where the exact population in July 2002 in Bangladesh was shown to be
133,376,684 and religious distributions were: Muslim 83 %, Hindu 16 %, Other 1%
(1998%). Quite a large number of Hindu populations, aren't they ? I am not
sure if any country or even UN has such comprehensive data about this world, and
I never had any doubt or question about their authenticity. The other site:
(http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/hindu_bangla.html),
provides statistics on the number of Hindus massacred in the then East
Pakistan in 1971, to be exact 2.47 millions. This figure is calculated based
on many international investigations, is close to three million as claimed by
many peoples including the post independent Government in Bangladesh. Why then
this game to downplay the numbers of Hindus in Bangladesh (both inhabitants and
those killed in 1971)? The answer is rather simple and may become more clear in
the following discussion.
The Nazi's (read similarity between
Nazism and Islamic philosophy) are trying to downplay WWII holocaust during the
last 60 years, with little success. Why any Government (past and present) in
Bangladesh is reluctant to list the massacred peoples in Bangladesh including
those who were killed in direct confrontation with Pakistanis (muktibahinis=freedom
fighters)? Since 1972, all Governments in Bangladesh are making and remaking a
real list (?) of the muktibahinis, God knows that they will never do it.
Although it would not be very difficult because there are people who were
fighting directly still alive (Banga Bir Mr. Bagha Kader Siddiqi MP can give an
account how many of his comrades lost lives in fighting), or in the archives
with Indian military. All civilians who were killed/murdered can be traced in
every village or in towns, witnesses are still alive in Bangladesh,
India
and in Pakistan. Numbers game is a common strategy among the Muslims; either to
downplay or the reverse as deemed necessary.
The problem of the majority of Muslims
in Bangladesh is that, it is so shameful and unbearable that the majority of the
lost lives were Hindus, and the fruits are mainly being enjoyed by a small group
of Muslims, carefully using Islam for this purpose. What a shame to let other
peoples know, particularly the Ummah (because most of them mainly associate with
the Ummah, the rest of the Muslims in this world). Thousands of Indian soldiers
sacrificed also their lives to liberate a nation from the devils, and how can
the Ummah accept this that the country was liberated by the pool of blood of so
many infidels ? Such denials of the pool of bloods of so many souls for the
liberation of a country is unparallel in the history of mankind, probably it is
mandatory to do so in the name of Islam.
Some weeks ago the military operation in
the name of controlling terrorists started in Bangladesh. As the result many of
the known terrorists have landed in the West. This happens now and then
irrespective of the group in power in Bangladesh. Hundreds of thousands of
Bangladeshi Muslims have migrated by using various ways to the West since the
liberation of that country (the blood of about 3 million innocent people made
this possible). Thousands of them can be categorized not only as terrorists but
also as severe violator of Human Rights, back at their home according to the
Western standard. Thousands of the Pakistanis who perpetrated genocide in East
Pakistan are also said to be living in the West. These are sleeping terrorist
cells and are ready to bite as soon as the time is ripe, as was done recently in
the USA by the 19 Arabs.
These peoples can be easily traced from
their past activities in their homeland (this was done in recent time in the
case of former Yugoslovia and Rwanda in the Western countries), as well as from
their activities in the present lands of shelter. Some of the murderers of Sk
Mujib (discussed later) are still roaming in the West. To remind you that the
West has selective definition of terrorism and murderer so as the muslims (none
of them accept terrorism as Universal evil in reality). You may easily find some
recent examples. Generally in connivance with those in power these terrorists
slip into other countries, strange however, that they can provide in details
whereabout the criminals and then claim that it was the fault of the host
country.
In the beginning of the last century
(1904) Nawab Salimullah, a settler from Kashmir in Dacca, the then eastern part
of Bengal, declared that Eastern part of Bengal (the then East Pakistan and
present Bangladesh) including Assam have to be separated from the rest of Bengal
and India because the majority of the people were Muslims. Salimullah did not
speak Bengali, neither those who were surrounding him did. Still today the
remnants speak a strange language at home and in the streets of Dhaka,
unfamiliar to most of the Bengalis.
Some Bangali readers may remember
discussions on controversy over Tagores anti Bengaldesh stance (although the
concept of Bangladesh was not there) now and then in websites related to
Bangladesh. These peoples simply consider the breaking of Bengal into religious
lines the starting point of the concept, ”Two Nation Theory”, that means, a
Muslim can not live in the same country where infidel human beings live (most of
the Muslim countries are ethnically cleansed or almost cleansed because of this
principle). Surprisingly, most of these writings are coming from the Bengali
Muslims living in the infidel countries.
I will try to elaborate a bit on the
Kashmir connection of the genocide of Hindus in the East Pakistan later. The
process is still going on in Bangladesh albeit with less intensity. Sometimes
different approaches are taken based on the teachings of the Holy Book to adjust
of the prevailing situation around the world. Recent comments by Taslima Nasrin
is worthy to mention (http://atimes.com/ind-pak/DF06Df01.html).
In that comment on Gujrat violence she called Gujrat violence as communal riots
and the one happening in Bangladesh as genocide.
To mention here, the comment in reply
to a question in new York by Mrs. Hasina (immediate past Prime minister and
present opposition and leader and leader of the largest political party in
Bangladesh), who advised the hindus to be loyal citizens of Bangladesh and not
to keep feet on two boats (http://www.mayerdak.com/dec1999c1.htm).
Similar advice was used to given by the
late president Mr. Ziaur Rahman during his meeting with minority people (as his
close associates do witness). He even went to the extent that the Hindus should
forget India instead they should build Gaya, Kashi etc. (Hindu religious places)
in Bangladesh. On the contrary, hundreds of Muslims travel to India by special
train from Bangladesh to attend urs at different majars
(shrines), not to mention about Mecca to perform haj with Government subsidy,
although it is forbidden in Koran (to take help from others to perform haj),
what a contradiction! Since Calcutta was the capital of Bengal and even for
whole India for sometimes during the British rule, and industrially and
educationally, developed in the then India, thousands of peoples not only from
Bengal but also from other parts of India were divided already before the
partition. The way you can also find today in Dhaka or in any capital or big
city around the world.
The number of divided families increased
to millions after the partition, mostly Hindu families, but thousands of Muslim
families are also still divided. The advices of Mrs. Hasina or the late Ziaur
Rahman were not surprising because Muslims think that only they have the rights
in both ways.
Hundreds of thousands of Bengali Muslims
are living nowadays abroad and they can have dual citizenships, no body will ask
you questions. But if you are a Hindu then you are accused of having lost all
your loyalty as soon as you cross the border to India, either for religious
obligations (all of Hindu religious places are located in different parts of
India) or to meet your relatives. That is a general rule practised by most of
the Bengali Muslims irrespective of political affiliation (see some recent
postings in Bangladesh related websites even from those living in the West).
Please see the Kashmir connection and
similarity (more follows) in ethnic cleansing. Most of the non-Muslims in the
Pakistan occupied Kashmir were murdered during occupation by Pakistan 1948, a
few could escape to India. In the Indian part of Kashmir, all non-Muslims in the
valley have been driven out of their homes, and thousands were killed by the
Muslim terrorists including destruction of their homes and religious places
(this happened quite recently even under Indian rule and it is still going on).
At the same time hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Muslims have settled in other
parts of the world and in other states of India (some of these Kashmiris
presumably are considered as guilty for their crime back home against
non-Muslims). This principle of ownership of both ways is common to all Muslims
including Bangladeshis, Pakistanis, Kashmiris, and Arabs.
The present Pakistani military
president, visited Bangladesh sometimes ago, after the present regime in
Bangladesh came to power. Few months prior to his visit, one of the devils of
the modern time (in disguise of human being) known as the butcher of Dacca,
General Tikka Khan (worthy to research relationship between Chengiz Khan, the
great butcher) was buried with state honour in that country. Many of his Bengali
Muslim brothers were begging him just to regret and then forget the genocide in
Bangladesh.
But the problem is, massacre of infidels
is considered as part of holy jihad and a true Muslim cannot accept otherwise.
Turkey is guilty of the massacre of the Armenians a century ago and is still
reluctant to accept that, based on the same principle, I suppose. (http://www.davidicke.net/tellthetruth/history/genocine.html)
.
Few weeks ago Mrs. Hasina came
back from her visit to USA and Europe. A barrage of questions of the identity of
her daughter in law were asked by the journalists if she was Indian or not,
during a news conference in Dhaka (can be read in BD related websites). The
reply of Mrs. Hasina was a burning example how seriously Bangladesh as a nation
in particular, and the Muslims in general, are suffering from severe moral and
intellectual crisis.
To note that, India houses more muslins
than live in Bangladesh, even thousands of Bangladeshi Muslims are divided
between India and Bangladesh. Some of the Indian Muslims are among the richest
and great personalities of the present world. India provided shelter including
to Mrs. Hasina and her children; in addition of many political leaders and
freedom fighters from Bangladesh, not to mention more than 12 million refugees
during liberation war in 1971. Mrs. Hasina simply did not had the moral strength
to reply the questions by asking what would be wrong if her son was married to
an Indian Muslim girl, probably because the Ummah would be very displeased.
Some months after the Gujrat crisis in
India, a large number of Bangladeshi professors in the West (I assume they are
educated in the West, and I have no doubt that these personalities have reached
the highest academic position by virtue of their outstanding contribution in
their respective area of speciality), but just read their reaction. “We
also strongly advocate that the acts in Gujarat must not be seen by the
Muslim community as an open invitation to commit similar criminal and inhuman
acts against "any" minority population that might exist in their Muslim majority
states”, (http://www.bangladesh-web.com/news/may/13/g13052002.htm#A9
). If you read the whole statement you never see any utterance what caused that
tragedy in Gujrat. Moreover, if you read carefully there is a veil threat to the
Bangladeshi minorities living thousands of miles away from Gujrat.
Muslims never criticise Muslims, no
matter what crime they may commit. Examples of such happenings are plenty. A
strange brotherhood indeed! One of the most recent terrifying examples was the
gassing of thousands of Kurds (100 % Sunni Muslims) in the town Halabja by the
Iraki regime. The Iraki regime can only be compared with the regimes in Pakistan
in terms of number of killings, destruction of properties and displacement of
millions of human beings from their home (within the respective countries and to
their surrounding neighbours). Example are former East Pakistan, Afghanistan and
Kashmir in case of Pakistan, war with Iran and Kuwait in case of Iraq, somebody
may help with real statistics.
No Islamic countries or organisations or
intellectuals or the anarchists in other countries raised their voice against
the crimes to the humanity perpetrated by these regimes. Even the UN was looking
silently when the former President of Afghanistan was snatched away from the UN
custody in Kabul and was brutally murdered by the Pakistanis in the disguise of
Taliban.
Here is another terrifying example; in
April 2002, eight months after the attacks of Sept. 11, a Saudi cleric named
Sheik Saad al-Buraik, preaching in a mosque in the Saudi capital of Riyadh,
called for the enslavement of Jewish women by Muslim men. "Do not have mercy or
compassion toward the Jews". "Their women are yours to take, legitimately. God
made them yours." This high-ranking Saudi priest was a member of the official
Saudi delegation that accompanied Crown Prince Abdullah during his visit to
President Bush in his ranch in Texas, at the end of April 2002. This was
mentioned by Mr. Richard Bernstein while commenting on the book ”The House of
Saud From Tradition to Terror” (nytimes.com/2002/11/08/books/).
The same principle is adopted in
Bangladesh when they terrorise and violate Hindu women folk. You never have
heard if any perpetrators of such crimes against Hindu women that has ever been
punished in Bangladesh.
Another very recent even more terrifying
example, the honour they paid to the killer of CIA agents in USA (who could be
compared with any mass murderer) shown in Quetta (Pakistan) where thousands of
people received the dead body of the murderer, Pakistan’s newly elected national
assembly started the function after paying homage to this departed soul,
thousands of peoples were gathered to attended the ceremony including Government
Officials and leaders of all political parties. Unbelievable, isn’t it? Can a
state decorate a terrorist who was convicted for murdering cold bloodedly
several civilians as a martyr? Yes, such bizarre things can happen only in
countries that are governed according to Islamic rule.
It seems, almost all political
leaders/rulers in all Muslim majority countries and a large number the Muslim
intellectual communities including their priests, are simply passing through
very serious moral and intellectual crisis. If this is a sign of total chaos and
anarchy in the Muslim countries is to be seen in the future.
It would be unbelievable to any
Westerner who has not been studying closely the Muslims. I mean literally
closely (being surrounded by them and understanding their language, culture and
religious rituals). I will briefly mention a small fraction, how ethnic
cleansing is conducted in Bangladesh, based on the principles written in Koran
and Hadis. After 1971, the policy of implementation was changed from open
genocide to subtle/low intensity genocide/ethnic cleansing. First priority was
to create a security apparatus devoid of minorities, which had additional
objective to capture the Eastern part of India including West Bengal (with
helping hands from those countries are mentioned before).
Many people would jump to cite example
of the Rakhhi Bahini (a special security apparatus was built after creation of
Bangladesh), but in reality very few Hindus were inducted, somebody may help
with the statistics (real statistics, because lying about non-Muslims is one of
the main pillars of the belief). I have heard myself conversation by the Rakhhi
Bahini leaders mentioning Hindus as “malauns”, a popular abusing word meant
Hindus in Bangladesh, which is used almost by all Muslims, irrespective of
education or political affiliation.
If any Hindu attends any interview to be
recruited in the security apparatus, first question they will ask the Hindu
aspirant is: if he would eat beef, just to scare them away (Hindus do not eat
beef as the Muslims or Jews do not eat pork for different reasons). The
administrative and judiciary apparatus is almost devoid of Hindus (see above for
% of Hindu population in BD).
You will be amazed if you get the chance
to talk to any BD military openly. They will give you rather good estimate when
(in terms of year and months) they are going to hoist the BD flag in the Fort
Williams in Calcutta, more or less the same way a Pakistani military will give
you an estimate even more accurately (in terms of week and day), when they are
going to hoist their flag on the top of Lal Kella in Delhi. As unbelievable as
it may sound, I have heard it by my own ears the slogans were shouted in the
streets of Dhaka by the militaries during the day of the so called revolution
day in BD.
There is nothing wrong to educate ones
security apparatus by showing a visible enemy, however, the problem is that they
consider the entire Hindu population in BD as Indian agents (see some recent
postings in NFB), which they consider as their natural enemy because the
majority of the population in India is Hindu.
Very often inhuman methods are applied
to conduct systematic ethnic cleansing; different approaches are taken for this
purpose. Occupation of their properties in the pretext of various laws to force
the Hindus to sell their properties at a very cheap price which in turn also
forces them to flee the land. Hindu business communities and other professionals
are the groups subjected to continuous pressure mainly by the whole Government
machinery (you may find some extraordinary exceptions).
Quite often Hindu young girls, even
minors are kidnapped and forcefully converted and married to Muslims in
connivance with security, administrative and judicial machineries.
To violet and
dishonour Hindu women is also a part of the strategy, as instructed in the Quran
(considered as an additional key to the heaven although that is already
exclusively granted to the Muslims). Continuous pressure to the Hindu community
by dishonouring their women folk is part of the whole strategy (http://www.janakantha.com
October 12, 2002).
One never hears any justice is brought
upon those who rape the Hindu women in Bangladesh (many such crimes go
unreported because of social implications and instead they prefer to migrate to
India). Since the security and administrative apparatus are almost completely
devoid of Hindus, these peoples enjoy all opportunity to terrorise the Hindu
civilians, by abusing, harassing, raiding their homes, severe torture without
any reason, sometimes even selective murder. These are done to generate terror
in the hearts of Hindus, to force them to leave their homes, more or less the
way the prophet used to do to the infidels (even during the present military
operation several Hindus were murdered in the city of Dhaka, quite unusual in
terms of number and timing).
This ritual of harassing of non-Muslims
is considered to be the silver key to the doors in the heaven to Muslims.
Raiding the caravans (buses or at the borders) of the Hindu visitors to India is
quite common even when peoples possess valid documents. They simply would tell
you that your documents are false, and there is no ways for the poor people to
prove otherwise. Only way to escape is to give them their valuables they
possess. News of such happening you may read now and then, even it happens in
the heart of the capital of Bangladesh.
The sufferings may not end there in
Bangladesh, their last possessions can be taken away even in the Indian side by
threatening these helpless and defenceless civilians of all ages to be sent back
to Bangladesh. Very often entire families are sent to jails in India (violating
International laws. India had even the legal responsibility to evacuate
non-Muslims from Pakistan according to the statute of partition /independence in
1947), and continues the endless agony of these human beings.
During the first military rule in BD, in
villages, Hindu men used to be picked up selectively (not in massive scale,
however) and beaten severely by the militaries to terrorise the entire Hindu
population. Many of these terrorised peoples left the country as soon as they
could.
Where did these Hindus that were
displaced from Bangladesh end up? You find them in the streets, in the slums in
big cities, in addition to West Bengal and other surrounding states in India,
doing all sorts of menial work to survive. Thousands of them had been forcefully
shipped to Andaman Islands and in the jungles of distant states in India during
the post partition era. This caused permanent separation from their natural
environment and close relatives to millions of Bengali Hindus after the
partition.
A very large number of human beings have
been subjected to continuous atrocities and crimes are being perpetrated against
them during the last 55 years. This is only comparable to what was done to the
Jews during WWII. All the three countries, Bangladesh, Pakistan and India are
directly involved to this colossal human suffering in the modern history of
mankind.
Genocide and Crime Against Humanity in Bangladesh
Part 2
By Abinash Baghchi
Bangladesh
9.
Fate of three contemporary leaders and genocide in East Pakistan
10.
Destiny of Bangladesh
11. Inevitable
12. International communities
13.
Immediate
actions necessary in Bangladesh
14. Time to retreat and show Islamic mercy in Bangladesh-Kashmir-Palestine
15. An one eyed man and war on
terrorism
16. The dilema
Have the tragic and
violent deaths of the three contemporary undisputable leaders of the peoples in
their respective lands in the Indian-subcontinent, anything to do with the
genocide on about three million hindus in East Pakistan (many Pakistanis and
Bangladeshis do not believe in the term Indian-subcontinent, but they believe
that their countries have fallen out of the heaven) ?
If you believe in
god or not, does not matter. The reasoning can be fitted in both philosophies,
the punishment by the god or by the rule of nature. Let us look through
briefly, how these three leaders directly and indirectly, were responsible for
the most horrendous crime against humanity and genocide in the post WWII era,
mainly on the civilian hindu populations in the then East Pakistan in 1971 and
their fate.
1. The background
player (Nato Raj in Bengali) of this diabolic tragedy was probably Mr. Zulfikar
Ali Bhutto (ZAB). Most probably he was personally involved as the chief of the
policy making and as adviser during the whole process, who was executed by the
Pakistani militaries. If this gentleman played his political role what he was
supposed to play, the history of the colossal human tragedy could probably have
been avoided. Departure of this gentle man happened through a very long and
painful process which even a common criminal is not subjected to, anywhere in
this earth where at least some civilization exists. Later the rest of the male
members of his family were also murdered in violent ways.
2. The undisputable
leader in the post partition period in East Pakistan was Mr. Shaikh Mujibur
Rahman (BBSMR), the architect and founder of the nation Bangladesh with his
unparallel leadership. He was awarded the title no body received earlier, in
spite of his role in the hindu muslim rioting in Calcutta prior to partition in
1947. He promised to the Bengali people irrespective of religion in the East
Pakistan, a country based on justice and happiness, the Switzerland of the east.
Majority of the people of East Pakistan, with exception of considerable number
muslim collaborators (who were part of the crime on genocide), supported him in
his long struggle for the liberation of Bangladesh from the bondage of slavery.
Probably under the
compulsion of the Islamic Brotherhood or Ummaism, Mr. BBSMR of Bangladesh (BD),
few years after the liberation of BD, forgave the horrendous crime of this
dimension with collaboration with the other two leaders, which he neither had
authority nor mandate to do so. Actually, no human being or leaders of what so
ever power he/she might possess, has no mandate to do so. Even after more than
60 years , the associates of the nazis are still being being investigated for
their possible crime (read the difference between barbarism and civility).
We were told how
big hearted this person was, actually a very heartless person can just forget
the violent brutal murder of so many peoples by the devilish power. It is not
revenge but justice that is why a state exists otherwise a state ceases to
exist, examples in the history are plenty even at these days. In this case the
word justice was raped even more barbarously than what the Pakistanis did, those
peoples (the core leaderships surrounding BBSMR) simply did not have the
capacity to understand the consequences of writing off
crime of such magnitude. Just think, in addition of the family of BBSMR, how the
other core leaderships of pre- and post independent Bangladesh braced their
fate.
The departure of
BBSMR was violent albeit quite quickly, but the brutality used in this case was
only permissible in the name of the holy Book. It was in the darkness of a night
in August 1975, when the devils landed in the city of Dhaka in the disguise of
human beings. In the darkness, they committed one of the most gruesome murder of
so many civilians while they were sleeping. The civilized human society has not
witnessed in recent times such brutality. Not even a child or pregnant women
were spared, cruelty was boundless. Still today the cry for the justice can be
heard, strange enough, even when Awami League was in power they could not bring
the devils to justice, what a fate!
3. Mrs. Indira
Gandhi, the then prime minister of India had the power to stop or to minimise
the genocide on the hindus in East Pakistan. Instead of doing so, she started to
conspire with her advisers (many of them were Kashmiri pandits). This was
planned to take possible advantage over Pakistan over Kashmir problem. She
concealed the real happenings in East Pakistan to the common people of India in
particular, and to the world in general. At that time many Bengali muslims were
also collaborating with the Pakistanis on the genocide on hindus in East
Pakistan. Moreover, she forced more than 12 million hindus to return to BD
without any guarantee of their security or protection of their basic human
rights. Still today the hindus are considered directly or indirectly as enemy of
the state of Bangladesh (see many postings in BD related websites recently).
Mrs. Gandhi even shared a dias in the Ramna garden in Dhaka city to a public
meeting with Mr. BBSMR, on the land confiscated from Ramna Kalibari temple
authority which was destroyed in 1971 but was not allowed to rebuild, the deity
is still homeless.
No body was
accounted for the massacare of three million human beings in the East Pakistan,
which India had the obligation to do so, as was the allied forces in Germany
after WWII. Although a war was won but in no time the victory was transformed
into colossal shameful defeat. In the history, that war in 1971 would not be
remembered more than a third world battle because of the third world standard of
the leaderships of the biggest third world country in this earth.
Instead of bringing
the most cruel war criminals, Mrs. Gandhi let them go free in exchange of
verbal assurance from ZAB to settle down the Kashmir problem by accepting LOC.
You see the results, not even the rest of the Kashmiri pandits in the valley
could live there although it was administered by India, what a consequence!
Later IG including her two sons lost their lives in a very violent manner. You
may make your own assessment why and how these three leaders disappeared from
this earth including their closest male family members. Do you think these are
just co-incidences or there are some reasons behind the brutal murders of these
three leaders?
The above part is
not written to hurt the feelings of the survivors of the three most popular
contemporary leaders of the subcontinent. Those leaders had the capacity to
change the fate of one billion plus peoples of the sub-continent but the history
has proved the opposite. Because these persons were public figures and as a
watcher of the happenings of the last 4 decades in the sub-continent and as a
human entity belonging to this sub-continent, I have expressed my personal
assessment of the happenings in the pre and post 1971, during which almost 3
million innocent defenseless civilians men, women, children, were brutally
murdered. Many of those peoples were murdered by simply cutting their throats or
bellies and were left to die of bleeding to be watched by the public. The
atrocities surpassed many times the horrible cruelty the world has watched how
journalist Daniel Pearl was murdered in Pakistan recently. Witnesses of these
crimes can be traced everywhere in Bangladesh and can be testified by those
butchers of the Pakistani army who are still alive.
Even today the
devilish forces, are trying to downplay by different forms, the gravity of this
crime against humanity. If you have not seen the faces of devils just turn on
the page (http://main.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/gallery.htm),
this is too devilish to be true at this age. Nobody has ever heard if these
perpetrators (those in Bangladesh) have brought to justice.
If you see the
sufferings of so large number of peoples, during so long time in the eastern
part of Bengal (present Bangladesh), you may naturally ask is this crime is
going to be unpunished ? I hardly think so. Some of the consequences, I have
tried to reason above. But those are minor compared with the sufferings of
humanity of such dimension.
Both India and
Pakistan have acquired atomic weapons, although they might have different
objectives. It seems, God has sent his own artisans (if you believe in god) to
build these weapons which are meant to be used in the future. This may be
inevitable because both Pakistan and India (the then rulers in particular), are
more or less equally responsible for the genocide in East Pakistan, and almost
all the perpetrators are still waiting to be brought to justice. A large number
of people of these two countries are probably going to be targeted for
unprecedented destruction, according to my personal guess.
You may ask why
innocent peoples have to suffer for the crimes done by others. This is the
verdict of the nature (if you do not believe in god). Very seldom the justice
comes immediately. In the individual level it may come very quickly (as in the
case of the three leaders), but in case of collective crime, it can take even
generations to pay back. Examples in the history are plenty, just look around
you. If you ask what punishment is waiting for Bangladesh, just have a look
below, although you may not agree.
The country was
promised to be Switzerland of the East, instead, within 30 years of freedom it
has achieved at least two World titles, and almost the third one:
1. The poorest
country in the world (matters very little if a few countries below BD)
2. The most
corrupted country in the world (it also matters very little if Nigeria or any
other country is just below BD)
3. The country has
almost reached its third objective, destination Somalia (not to offend Somalian
brothers and sisters). This aspect needs a bit more clarification:
After some years of
liberation, the destination towards modern life was abandoned , and readjusted
towards Mecca. After trying very hard, even selling camel jockeys
(probably
hundreds or thousands (?) in numbers of children were sold to the Arabs from
Bangladesh), we could not achieve a better title from our Ummah brethren, they
still call us Miskeen. Due to this and the situation prevailing in the world,
the new destination was again readjusted, a bit further away and this time
towards Somalia (speak 100 % Arabic and 100 % Sunni muslims).
This national
destination (chalo chalo Mogadishu !) is adapted after hard planing even with
our Ummah brethren and our intellectuals, to disintegrate the society completely
and subject its people to total caos and anarchy and terror to implement the
Islamic
Ummaism. You see,
where everybody is looking forward to reach other planets in the universe,
except the muslim countries who are in competetion among themselves how quickly
they can run backwords to reach the darkness of the 7th century.
My question, does
Bangladesh need any more punishment ? Well, what more you need? Just within 30
years of its liberation the population is doubled from 75 millions to at present
140 millions, and a large portion of these human beings do not even get food
per day what a chicken gets in the Western countries. Moreover, eruptions have
already begun before the violent volcanic explosion in this country during which
the human sufferings may surpass many times what they did to the hindus in 1971,
my very personal guess.
Do the western
countries and the International communities have any responsibility to
alleviate these human sufferings? Reply may be both yes and no, depending on the
direct national and International interests. Recent examples are Bosnia, Kosovo,
East Timor etc. However, the West was not so generous towards the Kurds.
Thousands of Kurds (100% Sunni muslims) were gassed to death, and hundreds of
thousands (millions ?) were driven out of their homes in Irak, millions in
Turkey are fighting for their self determination (see later, muslims use this
word only when they are in conflict with non-muslims) and nobody including
International communities or the muslim Ummahs or muslim intelligentsia uttered
a word.
If a crime could be
stopped by them (the International communities in such cases) who have the
capacity to do so but was not done, the moral responsibility still be there. The
International communities have seen helplessly what happened in 9/11. If the
devilish Talibans were destroyed a bit earlier, the tragedy of 9/11 could
probably been avoided. Now many in the West have no idea what a monster is in
the offing in Bangladesh with the direct Sino-Pakistan-Arabic conspiracy to
destroy the Indian/Tibetian civilization. This may not affect the West
immediately, but the long term impact woul be beyond imagination.
Bangladesh has
completely failed to protect its minority communities and its Governments have
been systematically perpetrating crime against humanity/ethnic cleansing
against them violating all International rules. The International community
should immediately consider the following for the interest of the mankind as
they have done in Bosnia, Kosovo and in East Timor.
-Under
International supervision, the genocide in the then East Pakistan should be
investigated and the perpetrators (all responsible dead or alive) should be
brought to justice
-
To constitute
independent enquiry under the supervision of UN and proper representatives of
hindu communities to document all who were murdered during 1971
-
Under
international supervision new independent census should be done immediately
-
To restructure
the existing security, administrative and judiciary apparatus with mixed
population with modern education as being done in Kosovo and Bosnia
-
All crimes
committed towards minority communities in recent years should be put on trial
and the criminals should be brought to justice
-
All the
properties taken away should be recovered and given back, or compensation
according to International norms should be provided to the affected hindus and
other minority community
-
All the displaced
peoples who were forcefully transferred to distant areas in India should be
brought back close to their homeland
-
To make easy and
simple procedures to reunite and visit millions of the Bengali hindus in India
and in Bangladesh
-
These have to be
done under UN authority, preferably by direct supervision of the British
Government who bears moral obligation for the sufferings of the hindus in
Bangladesh.
There are other
possible alternative solutions of this colossal human tragedy e.g., organised
population exchange (India and Pakistan were bound with this obligation based
on the statue of partition of India), problem is Indian muslims do not want to
migrate to Bangladesh, or creation of protected land for hindus within
Bangladesh under the supervision of UN as in the case of Kossovo.
If carefully
examined, mainly two conflicts as I mentioned in the beginning, to be named
Palestine and Kashmir, have virtually kept the entire humanity as their hostage
by instigating the menace of terrorism in the name of Islam. Very often muslim
terrorists, muslim leaders including muslim intellectuals claim these two
conflicts, are the root causes of all terrorism.
Most of the people,
however, would agree that the root causes of all Islamic terrorisms are in the
teachings of Koran. Interrelationship of the root causes of international
terroirism can be traced from the words and deeds in Bangladesh, Kashmir,
Pakistan, Palestine, Arabs, and other muslim countries and also in the countries
where there are substantial muslim communities.
Kashmiris and
Palestinians, and invariably all muslims (International Terrorism Inc. you may
call it) have more or less tuned views on these two issues. If one analyzes
these two conflicts between muslims and non-muslims, the number of peoples
involved and killed are very small fraction what is going on between muslims
themselves, and between muslims and non-muslims elsewhere. Such examples are
plenty, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Algeria, Morocco and Sahara, Somalia, Sudan,
Indonesia, Turkey, Irak, Thailand, Philippines, Bangladesh, India, Kashmir,
Pakistan, Chechnya, Russia. Somebody can help with real statistics. Similar
conflicts may be predicted in some Western cities in near future (my personal
guess within 30 to 50 years).
Wherever you find
considerable number of muslims (either majority or minority) you find hatred,
unrest, chaos, insecurity, terror, and policy of self destruction. Now a days if
you walk around in any western airports and malls, everybody looks at you if
your appearance is like an Arab or Indians (thanks to the Pakistanis!). See,
what those muslim terrorists have done in some hours not only to others on 9/11,
but also to themselves and it may take ages to reverse that, if that would be
possible at all.
Keeping aside the
controversy of the legality of accession of Kashmir for a moment, just remember
again that all the non-muslims have been killed in the Pakistan occupied
Kashmir, very few could escape. Even in the Indian part, many of the non-muslims
have been killed and the rest have been driven out of their homes (more or less
what has been done and being done in the rest of hindus in
Pakistan/Bangladesh). Now the question, who has empowered the Kashmiri muslims,
Pakistanis, Bangladeshis to kill and clean up those lands from the non-muslims
(just some centuries ago these lands were inhabited by 100 % non-muslims)? Has
any majority population group right to deny the right to exist or deny the basic
human rights of the minorities? Often the Pakistanis/Bangladeshis and the
Kashmiri muslims mention self determination of Kashmiris, by which they mean
their right granted by the holy book to eliminate and destroy the traces of the
indigenous civilization. Interesting to note that, at the same time it would be
difficult to find any muslim country in the world, where even their own muslim
populations have the right of self determination in real meaning.
The question is,
how the Kashmiri fierce sunni muslims are different from the other ethnical and
religious groups in the whole undivided India? Are the Kashmiri sunni (Wahabi)
muslims are a separate human race belonging outside the greater Indus
civilization ? Are the Kashmiri Sunni muslims are different from the Panjabi, or
Bihari or UP sunni muslims in India, or are they entitled naturally to possess
more rights than any other ethnic groups/citizens in Pakistan or in India?
Millions of hindus
(much more in numbers of the Kashmiri sunni muslims) from both Pakistan and East
Pakistan/Bangladesh have migrated to India (muslims also migrated from India to
these countries but much fewer in numbers). What is the problem for those fierce
Kashmiri sunni muslims to migrate to Pakistan and Pakistani occupied part of
Kashmir or anywhere they think they belong to, and leave the other muslims and
non-muslim Kashmiris alone. At the same time they are happy to enjoy tax payers
money of the infidel Indians and running havoc by instigating terrorism by
targeting civilians, women and children for murder and destruction and
desecrating hindu religious places in that land. Very often the muslim
terrorists and some leaders of muslim countries (see similarity) call Kashmir,
Palestine including Israel, countries like Indonesia etc. as muslim lands. How
a land can become muslim land, when this religion came to being only 14 hundred
years ago while the land mass of the earth may be millions of years old?
Kashmir is only a
tiny state in the Indian union where muslims are majority and number of
populations is around 7-8 millions. Whereas, in whole India more than 100
million muslims are housed, and they are living as minorities in all the other
states. Worthy to mention here that the majority of the muslims voted for
Pakistan, but most of them decided to stay in India after partition. This has to
be judged in the wider context (this word is very popular to muslims to fool the
West), the principle the muslims practice-my house is mine and your house is
mine too. The question is, where the hindus from Bangladesh, Kashmir, Pakistan
would get some space for their survival in India?
In the case of the
so called Palestine (in reality Arabs), the total number of population is
miniscule compared with size and the total number of Arabs living in the
surrounding states. Almost all Jews peoples have either been killed or driven
out of the Arabic countries. Has the Jews people right to exist in the land
which belonged to them many centuries ago and was occupied by the Arabs later?
While there are so many Arab countries, why it is necessary to create another
bizarre state composed of two wings on two sides of Israel with only several
hundred thousands people instead of merging these two parts with the adjoining
Arab countries?
This question of
Palestine-Israel-Indian -Sub-continent are linked because of the historical
connection. In both cases religion played the deciding factor. Almost all
muslims of the whole world are fierce supporter of the division of India or any
other country to break into pieces in the name of religion, even they are a
small fraction of the whole population. At the same time they support to kill or
force millions of non-muslims out of their homes whenever they can. But when it
comes the right of the others to defend themselves, the muslims start to take up
and create issues to portray that they are the victims.
Since the inception
of the religion Islam, millions of Arabs have migrated, invaded and captured
almost half of Africa and Asia, and up to central Europe. Even in modern times,
millions of Arabs including Palestinians have migrated and settled down in
various parts of the world, majority of them in the West. Being a born Egyptian,
Mr. Arafat has eternal right to lead the terrorism Inc. and create havoc in
Israel, but Israel does not even has the right to defend itself forget about
retaliation. Mr. Sharon being a Jew even has no right to perform his religious
duty in the most sacred worship place of the Jews, because the muslims has
created by violent force their third important mosque there. This principle has
been practiced by the muslims everywhere they have put their feet. Thousands of
temples have been destroyed even in recent times in
India-Pakistan-Kashmir-Bangladesh, but you will hear their very loud and noisy
voice when one controversial mosque (one among the innumerable mosques in the
whole Indian subcontinent which were built on destroyed Hindu temples) in India
was damaged by the hindu extremists.
If you count
carefully the total number of Palestinians (including those refugees living
outside Gaza and West Bank) displaced and killed, and compare that number of hindus killed and displaced only from Bangladesh, not to mention of Afghanistan,
you can see the astonishingly difference (melon and peanut). Still almost all
muslim individuals and countries will not oppose Pakistan, Bangladesh and
Kashmir in genocide and ethnic cleansing of hindus, shikhs, buddhists, but
oppose even to the right of the existence of the few millions Jews.
Worthy to mention
that Israel did not occupy these parts by aggression, but was captured when
collective aggression was imposed on it by the Arabs who aimed to destroy it.
Although personally I do not support that any human being should leave
his/her
own home or live under occupation, but in reality it is happening all the time
of the history, isn't it ?. The demography of the world is continuously changing
(in recent times mainly because of the Islamic havoc), examples are Bosnia, East
Timor, Kossovo, Indian-sub continent etc. Sometimes this is happening even with
helping hands from the so called powers of the free world. I am taking up these
issues because historically they are linked in terms of the root causes of these
conflicts, however, the muslims would take very contradictory positions on
these issues. Irrespective of origin, almost all muslims would deny the creation
of the state Israel, at the same time they support breaking into pieces of any
country which has a considerable muslims populations causing chaos and anarchy
and destruction.
The problem is,
even hundreds of Jerusalems or Kashmirs are given to these peoples, they still
will come after, the Koran has ordered to kill all Jews and other non-muslims.
To my personal opinion, Israel should leave the occupied territories only when
the verses in the Koran are abrogated by the collective Islamic clerics where
destruction of Jews peoples are ordered (only the muslim clerics can do so).
Almost 6 million
non-muslims have been killed in the last 3 decades only in East
Pakistan/Bangladesh and Sudan. The number of hindus killed and displaced from
Bangladesh alone during the last three decades would surpass the entire
population of Kashmir and Palestine. Then what is problem to settle down some
hundred thousand Arabs, within the surrounding vast Arab countries, from where
they originally migrated, and some millions fierce sunni muslims from Kashmir to
Pakistan or to some Arabic countries, for the shake of world peace ?
The Arab lands are
almost empty because they have pushed their own peoples to other countries
during the past centuries. Now they require so many peoples even to keep
functioning everyday services to their own citizens and for this they import
millions of muslim and non-muslim labourers from all over world. The Arab
countries may be alternative homes of many fierce muslims (in real terms to
bring back them to their own homes) who are incompatible to live with peoples
from other faiths.
Will ethnic
cleansing in the muslim majority countries and terrorism would stop in near
future ? Presumably not, because quite a large number of privileged peoples are
harvesting on this. The military and the elite groups in Pakistan, Kashmir and
in Palestine, and some Arabs are directly the beneficiaries. Billions of
dollars flows to the machineries of terrorism to keep the heat alive.
The price of patrol
may go down, so the incomes of the limited number of Arab countries, if peace
restores in the infected countries. At the same time the Palestinians and the
Kashmiris are having rather good life anyway (compared with millions of Arabs,
Bangladeshi, Pakistani or other muslims around the world), in exchange of lives
of some fanatics (they are promised the heaven with innumerable young women, so
nothing to loose). The costs in some billion dollars are not that much for the
few Arabs compared with the return they get from higher petroleum price by
keeping alive the “International Terrorism Inc”.
If you come and see
in Bangladesh, you will find fierce muslims who despise everything to do with
the native culture, religion, tradition, even language. They think that it is
their eternal right to destroy everything belonging to the non-muslims. As I
mentioned another alternative to solve Kashmiri/Palestinian problems, here can
also apply this. These fierce muslims think they do not suit in the local
culture and do not tolerate the presence of non-muslims, who actually owned the
country some centuries ago.
The Arab lands are
no more deserts as used to be in the 7th century when there was
necessity to push the peoples to other countries. This process has been going on
for too long time. It may be time to reverse the process and retreat from the
traditional policy, just to show the Islamic mercy to the indigenous populations
in many countries. Instead of causing all sorts of destruction and havoc, those
fierce and vicious muslims should start to think to retreat and go back to their
forefathers land which is no longer is just desert.
Now a days milk and
honey flows abundantly in the Arab lands. Sitting under the open air in the
dessert with sun glasses on and drinking coca cola and enjoying camel race on
which screaming horrified dying children are tied, is almost close to the
divine environment promised to the muslims. Can better lives for those fierce
and vicious muslims be imagined in this earth?
Very few people
could forget the one eyed (nobody knows if that eye was really bad or just to
hide the real face, a typical Islamic tradition) man during press conference,
who used to sit by the side of the ambassador of the Islamic Emirate of
Afghanistan in Islamabad, prior to their visible destruction. The purpose
probably was to scare the world. The question is, can the menace of
international terrorism be tackled by looking through one eye, by those who are
leading this war ?
It was promised to
the departed souls of thousands of innocent Americans whose lives were taken
away by using the most violent way one can imagine, to bring to justice those
who perpetrated this horrendous crime. It was also promised to the world in
general, that there will be no distinction who support, harbour or finance the
terrorists. What happened to those pledges and to the results of the war on
terrorism ? The masterminds of the terror (most of them have no face) are still
roaming and threatening the civilized and free world.
Pakistan, the only
country in the world of which the whole state apparatus is built on to
instigate terrorism (whose intelligence chief and a Kashmiri terrorist leader
were present in the US during 9/11, probably to verify personally the damage
caused by the terrorists), is still controlling the business as usual. The
Taliban and Al-Quaidas were synonymous to that state in terms of personnel and
materials, in addition to logistic support with the financial help from Saudis
and United Arab Emirates (these three countries had diplomatic relations until
the end).
The other source of
this terrorism is working in the background, and is the only beneficiary country
of the present world in this mess is China (quietly to destroy the Tibetian
culture and civilization by diverting world attention on terrorism and keeping
India busy in tackling terrorism and religious tensions caused by Bangladesh and
Pakistan with financial support from some Arab states and direct military
support from China), very few people talks about that.
Even before going
to Mecca, all the Pakistani leaders (irrespective of who is in power) pays visit
to Beijing first, then to UAE and and then the last destination Mecca. How the
super advisors of the US, the only super power at the present world, advised to
be friend with the devils to fight the terrorist devils, is beyond of my
imagination as a very common man. The Americans have very little chance to
rectify the consequences by this irreversible, irrerational and unbelievable
mistakes, because they simply do not understand the policy practiced by the
muslims based on the holy book, that they make treaty with the infidels just for
the opportunity to break it, the Hudaybiyah Treaty
(read Pakistani president's speech to the nation prior to support USA in the war
on terrorism in exchange of monetary benefit). Examples of such historical and
irreversible blunders of the moment by the leaders are plenty.
The country who was
behind the scene suddenly abounded its own creation, the Taliban. The
Pakistanis abandoned the Talibans and the Al-Quaidas so crudely that parallel
example is difficult to find (same medicine which is only prescribed for the
infidels), at the same time the Pakistanis curse USA because in their
imagination they think that US should not have abandoned them after the
previous Afghan war. The Americans at least pay in cash and materials for every
favour they received from Pakistan. But the Pakistanis did not betray USA 100 %
anyway, they helped to catch only some level 3 Al-Quaida leaders, including the
last Afghan ambassador in Pakistan, God knows where that one eyed gentleman is
housed at this moment.
The Pakistanis
almost got from the USA what they wanted, but the USA still looking what they
wanted in the rugged mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is not
very unexpected. The investment Pakistan and some other Arabic countries made in
the creation of the Taliban and the Al-Quaidas were too high to be sold off in
exchange of a couple of billions of dollars, and an honour to lecture at the
Harvard University (presumably the most respected institution to peruse
knowledge in this earth). The person was who was supposed to face justice for
torture of captured soldiers in captivity by gorging eyes and genitals by his
soldiers (forbidden by all International rules), probably now heading towards
Oslo to receive the Nobel Prize for his contribution in the promotion of the
menace terrorism.
The President of
the USA had a very bad start (generally very bad sign in the eyes of the
Eastern philosophers), but had the possibility to change the course of the
history by ruthless pursuance of war against terrorism (not to revenge but to
bring the perpetrators to justice which is the pillar of the very existence of
any society), but it seems so far the other country who has benefited directly
from this war is Iran (it was a collateral benefit).
Well, how can that
be? You see, the Arabs had destroyed the Persian culture almost totally (some
remnants can still be found mainly in India), the Persians by some unknown
reasons adopted a variant of Islam not recognized by the Arabs. The Arabs even
tried through Iraq to re-conquer Persia, but failed. The Arabs again attempted
this by creating the Taliban and the Al-Quaidas through Pakistan. In parallel to
this, shiite muslims in Pakistan were also targeted, hundreds of shiite muslims
including dozens of doctors were murdered in Pakistan which has stopped for the
time being. Probably the present Persian leaderships do not understand what a
great help was given to them by the West, although they are fond of to malign
them as Satan (same medicine was returned by the word "evils"). If the Taliban
were the winner, the remnants of the Persian culture would become a history, the
same way they caused violent destruction to the harmless statue of Buddha, a
heritage of the whole mankind.
If the gentle man
sniper shooter in Washington, appears in the court and claim that what he has
done was his religious obligation to do so, and American constitution guarantee
the right of every individual to perform his/her own religion, what a delicate
situation, isn't it ? This right of freedom of religion is also guaranteed by
the declaration of the Universal Human Rights. If a religion preach violence and
at the same time state's laws prohibit violence, which one should take
precedence ? The answer may be very obvious to any Westerner but not in Islamic
countries.
Many Islamic
countries sentence individuals to death even unknowingly showing any disrespect
to this most vulnerable religion in this earth (all Islamic countries have
special guarantee for this vulnerability). Some years ago Calcutta high court
gave a strange verdict on a petition by some individual regarding the violent
teachings of Koran. Is it the responsibility of the UN or individual states to
handle this situation, or is it overdue for the muslim intellectuals (not the
gentleman priest from Saudi Arabia and those Bangladeshi intellectuals and
likes) to start an open discussion on these before it is too late ?
A very serious
dilema the whole human kind is facing today that is, can the existence of any
human race be a subject of negotiation because it is written in a religious book
(existence of the Jews peoples and other non-believers are denied in the Koran)?
My personal question to all of you -can existence of even an insignificant
animal species be a subject of negotiation?
Many of the above
views naturally would not reflect as seen by a vicious muslim from any country
(fierce and vicious muslims never agree with anything to do with non-muslims
according to religious teachings). However, objective discussion necessary to be
initiated openly based on facts on the problems facing the sub-continent in
particular, and the humanity in general, for their permanent solutions. The
first consensus should be arrived among
civilizations whether if it is possible to safeguard one's
right of existence at the same time denying the right of existence of the
others. Otherwise better not to initiate the process at all, and let the nature
take care of all the sufferings of the
humanity to their natural end.
|
